GY
George Young — 1940 US Census Record
Model Tree available1940 United States Federal Census · Buncombe-County, North Carolina
Our Model Tree links this George Young across the 1920, 1930 and 1940 US Censuses in Buncombe-County, North Carolina (XGBoost, ~Confirmed), with identified parents William & Lottie — first a son (b.~1912), then head of a 6-person household.
Age 28
b. ~1912
Male
Son
Born: North Carolina
Single
1940 Census Record Details
| Census Year | 1940 |
| Location | Buncombe-County, North Carolina |
| Surname | Young |
| Given Name | George |
| Relationship to Head | Son |
| Sex | M |
| Color / Race | Black |
| Age | 28 |
| Marital Status | Single |
| Birthplace | North Carolina |
| 1935 Residence (City) | Asheville |
| 1935 Residence (County) | Buncombe |
| Additional Details | |
| Occupation | Roller |
| Industry | Tannery |
| Class of Worker | PW |
| Hours Worked | 44 |
| Income (1939) | 496 |
| Highest Grade | No 0 |
| 1935 Residence | Same place |
| Birth State | North Carolina |
| Birth Country | United States |
| Birthplace (normalized) | north carolina |
| Occupation | Roller |
| Township / Ward | Asheville |
| Est. Birth Year | ~1912 |
Household Members
Census records only state relationship to the household head.
Pairwise kinship is derived (~90–95% accurate), not recorded.
Step/blended families and boarders can break it.
6 people recorded at the same address in the 1940 census.
| Name | Relation to head | Relative to George | Age | Birth yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lattie Young | Head | — | 53 | ~1887 |
| George Young | Son | — | 28 | ~1912 |
| Roy Young | Son | — | 10 | ~1930 |
| Grafton Young | Son | — | 12 | ~1928 |
| Linford Young | Son | — | 20 | ~1920 |
| John Young | Son | — | 15 | ~1925 |
Census Appearances
1920
Buncombe, North …
Other, age 7
Buncombe, North Carolina · implied b. ~1913 — 7 household members
●
Primary link
· ~Confirmed · 2 sources
XGBoost
Household
| Surname | Young |
| Given Name | George |
| Relationship to Head | Grandson |
| Sex | M |
| Color / Race | Black |
| Age | 7 |
| Marital Status | Single |
| Birthplace | North Carolina |
| Father's Birthplace | North Carolina |
| Mother's Birthplace | North Carolina |
| Can Read | No |
| Can Write | No |
| Birth State | North Carolina |
| Birth Country | United States |
| Birthplace (normalized) | north carolina |
1930
Buncombe, North …
Son, age 18
Buncombe, North Carolina · implied b. ~1912 — 8 household members
●
Primary link
· ~Confirmed · 2 sources
XGBoost
Household
| Surname | Young |
| Given Name | George D. |
| Relationship to Head | Son |
| Sex | M |
| Color / Race | White |
| Age | 18 |
| Marital Status | Single |
| Birthplace | North Carolina |
| Father's Birthplace | North Carolina |
| Mother's Birthplace | North Carolina |
| Occupation | Laborer |
| Industry | Laundress |
| Class of Worker | W |
| Can Read/Write | Yes |
| Birth State | North Carolina |
| Birth Country | United States |
| Birthplace (normalized) | north carolina |
1940
Buncombe-County, North …
Son, age 28
Buncombe-County, North Carolina · implied b. ~1912 — 6 household members
| Surname | Young |
| Given Name | George |
| Relationship to Head | Son |
| Sex | M |
| Color / Race | Black |
| Age | 28 |
| Marital Status | Single |
| Birthplace | North Carolina |
| 1935 Residence (City) | Asheville |
| 1935 Residence (County) | Buncombe |
| Occupation | Roller |
| Industry | Tannery |
| Class of Worker | PW |
| Hours Worked | 44 |
| Income (1939) | 496 |
| Highest Grade | No 0 |
| 1935 Residence | Same place |
| Birth State | North Carolina |
| Birth Country | United States |
| Birthplace (normalized) | north carolina |
Model Tree
An inferred pedigree reconstructed from census links — up to 4 generations within the 1900–1950 window. Closer generations are built from household co-residence; deeper ones are bridged by following a relative to their own childhood census. Confidence compounds and weakens with each generation.
Our Model Tree links George Young across 3 US Census years (1920, 1930 and 1940) in 2 locations, using XGBoost record linkage. Identified parents: father William Young (~0.92 confidence) and mother Lottie Young (~0.92 confidence) and mother Lattie Young (~0.92 confidence). The pedigree spans 1 generation with 3 identified ancestors.
Show:
Gen 1
Parents
confidence ≈ 0.92
Father
William Young
b. ~1883
Source father
● Household
· direct · ~0.92
Mother
Lottie Young
b. ~1889
Source mother
● Household
· direct · ~0.92
Mother
Lattie Young
b. ~1887
Source mother
● Household
· direct · ~0.92
This person
Anchor record
George Young
Son · 1940 · age 28 · b. ~1912 · North Carolina
★ You are viewing this record
Sibling
Grafton Young
Sibling · 1940 · age 12
Source co-child of head (derived)
● Co-child · derived · ~0.88
Sibling
Linford Young
Sibling · 1940 · age 20
Source co-child of head (derived)
● Co-child · derived · ~0.88
Sibling
John Young
Sibling · 1940 · age 15
Source co-child of head (derived)
● Co-child · derived · ~0.88
Sibling
Roy Young
Sibling · 1940 · age 10
Source co-child of head (derived)
● Co-child · derived · ~0.88
Confirmed / household (~0.90+)
Probable / derived (~0.65–0.89)
Candidate (<0.65, unverified)
Original Census Page
1940 US Federal Census — Buncombe-County, North Carolina
Open full size
1940 US Federal Census — Buncombe-County, North Carolina
Page Contents
40 people indexed on this census page (nara:1940:m-t0627-02879-00066)
| Line | Name | Age | Relation | Occupation | Birthplace |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 41 | Columbus Gould | 16 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 42 | Garfield Gould | 14 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 43 | Few Malloy | 36 | Daughter | — | North Carolina |
| 44 | Cornelius | 14 | Grandson | — | North Carolina |
| 45 | Joe Ray | 40 | Head | Kitchen Help | North Carolina |
| 46 | Marie Ray | 39 | Wife | General Housework | North Carolina |
| 47 | Samuel M. Clayton | 72 | Head | — | North Carolina |
| 48 | Mary Clayton | 53 | Wife | — | North Carolina |
| 49 | Jane Clayton | 83 | Sister | — | North Carolina |
| 50 | Fred Clayton | 11 | Grandson | — | North Carolina |
| 51 | George Bradley | 30 | Head | Laborer | Florida |
| 52 | Mary Bradley | 23 | Wife | — | North Carolina |
| 53 | Georgia F. Bradley | 9 | Daughter | — | North Carolina |
| 54 | Betty J. Bradley | 7 | Daughter | — | North Carolina |
| 55 | Paul J. Bradley | 5 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 56 | Mabel G. Bradley | 3 | Daughter | — | North Carolina |
| 57 | Thelma I. Bradley | 1 | Daughter | — | North Carolina |
| 58 | Samuel Allen | 30 | Head | Laborer | North Carolina |
| 59 | Ada Allen | 25 | Wife | — | South Carolina |
| 60 | Nathaniel Allen | 15 | Son | — | South Carolina |
| 61 | Samuel Jr. Allen | 10 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 62 | Lattie Young | 53 | Head | — | North Carolina |
| 63 | George Young THIS PERSON | 28 | Son | Roller | North Carolina |
| 64 | Linford Young | 20 | Son | Laborer | North Carolina |
| 65 | John Young | 15 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 66 | Grafton Young | 12 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 67 | Roy Young | 10 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 68 | Rufus Ardell | 40 | Head | Laborer | South Carolina |
| 69 | Lizzie Ardell | 31 | Wife | — | North Carolina |
| 70 | John R. Ardell | 12 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 71 | James Ardell | 10 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 72 | Allen Ardell | 8 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 73 | E. Rose Ardell | 7 | Daughter | — | North Carolina |
| 74 | Horace Ardell | 5 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 75 | Robert Ardell | 3 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 76 | Hattie Ardell | 1 | Daughter | — | North Carolina |
| 77 | Claude White Side | 30 | Head | Laborer | North Carolina |
| 78 | Charity White Side | 30 | Wife | — | North Carolina |
| 79 | Claude Jr. White Side | 11 | Son | — | North Carolina |
| 80 | Robert L. White Side | 8 | Son | — | North Carolina |
Pedigree Summary
George + 4 siblings
Gen 1 · 3 parents
~0.92
Max depth 4 (1900–1950 window)
About This Record & Model Tree
This record was independently indexed by YourRoots from the 1940 United States Federal Census (NARA). Our Model Tree links this person across census decades using XGBoost-based record linkage, with per-link confidence scores. Household corroboration strengthens the signal when co-residents appear on the same census pages in multiple years.
Source: National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)